Skip to main content

Service Bus Topic – How we can migrate from Service Bus Queue

Yesterday we saw different methods that give us the ability to communicate with Service Bus Topics and all spin around the HTTP/S.
Today we will reach a more sensible topic. How we can write a client and a server that at begging use Service Bus Queues and after a while be begin use Service Bus Topics. We want to achieve this with a minimal effort time. Also when the transition is done from queues to topics we want minimal changes in our code.
I think that we already observed that this two services are very similar. The API are almost the same, not only this, but also the message that is send and received from the services has the same time, BrokeredMessages. Until now, on all examples we used QueueClient and TopicClient classes to communicate with queues and topics. This is very good; those are the basic classes that should be used for normal situation. But if we look in these two classes we will discover a powerful property named “InternalSender”.
This class returns a “MessageSender” object. We have a similar way to get “MessageReceiver”. These are the base classes used by the framework to send and receive messages to and from Service Bus. We can imagine the QuequeClient and TopicClient as wrappers classes over two base classes that can make our life easier.
Using this two base class we will not need to know if we use a queue or a topic. These classes are configured based on a URL that can target a queue or a topic.
Before looking over the examples please check my last post where I presented how does a URL of a topic (subscription) or queue looks like. To have easier life, Windows Azure has a helper class available to use that help us to generate the URLs for topics and queues. But if you want to write them from scratch it will work without any problem.
First step is to create the base service URL (it starts with sb:// and contain the namespace of our service). This namespace is a generic namespace; don’t specify that the URL represent a queue or a topic.
Uri serviceAddress = ServiceBusEnvironment.CreateServiceUri("sb", “myFooNamspace”, string.Empty);
The last parameter represents the service path. Out of the box we don’t need to specify any value to this parameter. After this step, MessagingFactory class will help us to create URL where we include our credentials also:
MessagingFactory messagingFactory  = MessagingFactory.Create(serviceAddress, credentials);
Based on this MessagingFactory we can create MessagingReceiver and MessagingSender on the fly based on the entity path.
MessageReceiver qmr = messagingFactory.CreateMessageReceiver(“myFooQueueName”);
MessageReceiver tmr = messagingFactory.CreateMessageReceiver(“myFooTopic/subscriptions/subscriptionName1”);
MessageSender qms = MemessagingFactory.CreateMessageSender(“myFooQueueName”);
MessageSender fms = messagingFactory.CreateMessageSender (“myFooTopic”);
As you can see for the subscriptions of a topic we need to specify also the subscription name. But for the sender we don’t need to do something like this. Or course we have some helper methods like CreateTopicClient, CreateQueueClient, CreateTopicSubscription and so on, but this will not help us to make the code to be more easily ported from Service Bus Queues to Service Bus Topics.
The MessageSender and MessageReceiver classes have method as Send, Receive and all the methods that we can find in the QueueClient and TopicClient. Using this we can do the same thing. When the time will come to migrate from queue to client the only thing that we will need to do is to change the paths that specify the queues and topics.
Here you can find all the code that we need to communicate with a queue (or topic):
Uri serviceAddress = ServiceBusEnvironment.CreateServiceUri("sb", “myFooNamspace”, string.Empty);
MessagingFactory messagingFactory = MessagingFactory.Create(serviceAddress, credentials);
MessageReceiver qmr = messagingFactory.CreateMessageReceiver(“myFooQueueName”);
BrokeredMesssage brokeredMesssage = new BrokeredMessage();

qmd.Send(brokeredMesssage);
Simple, clean and smart. This is what I like at this implementation. The code remains simple and easy to understand in this way also. In this way we can migrate from queues to topics and back to the queues only by changing the configuration file.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP